Films and Labs

Fuji NPS and NPC update

Fujifilm has announced that they will replace NPS with Pro 160S
and NPC with Pro 160C in the US and other markets. The new films
have lower grain, RMS 3 instead of 4.

In Japan, there will be PRO 160NS (low contrast for flash portraits)
and PRO 160NH (higher contrast for portraits with natural light).
Sounds like 160NS = 160S and there is no 160NH outside Japan.

Anybody have further information?

 
 

See Also : Re: Fuji Pro 160S and 160C

"Bill Tuthill" wrote in message news:432ada1b@news.meer.net...
> Alan Browne asked:
>>>
>>> Ctein just published a review of them in Photo Techniques magazine.
>>
>> And what did they say... ? (Respectable mag, that).
>
> Here is a summary:
>
> Both print on the same channel, unlike NPS and NPC, although 160C requires
> 20% more exposure and 7CC yellow. Compared to the old films, the new ones
> have similar speed and latitude. Resolution is not measurably higher,
> though edge sharpness is improved. Mainly the grain is finer, more than
> expected from RMS 4 to 3. "160S is definitely finer-grained than [160NC]
> but it's nearly a draw between 160C and [Kodak UC 100]."
>
> Contrast ranking, lowest to highest: Portra 160NC, NPS/160S tie, UC 100,
> 160C, NPC.
>
> Saturation ranking, highest to lowest: 160C, UC 100, NPC, 160S, NPS,
> Portra 160NC.
>
> Best rendition of primary colors: 160C, UC 100, 160S, NPC, NPS, (big gap)
> Portra 160NC.
>
> Neutrality of gray scale: 160S, 160C, NPC, Portra 160NC, UC 100, NPS.
>
> Overall flesh-gray balance: 160C, 160S/Portra 160NC tie.
> Best light skin tones: UC 100, 160S, 160C.
> Best dark skin tones: 160C, 160S, UC 100.
>
> Overall color rendition: 160S. Second place UC 100 is lower contrast with
> better pastels, but worse oranges and reds. Third place 160C with superb
> saturation and color rendition, but too much contrast for accurate
> pastels.
>
> Tested by controlled exposures (at box speed?) and printing on Supra E.
>
> There are four pictures with the article: contrasty apple blossoms taken
> with 160S, telephoto shot of ocean surf taken with 160C, a fine looking
> 160S Macbeth chart, and an amazing comparison of yellow and gray grain
> between 160C and NPC.
>

I'm surprised they didn't include Portra 160 VC into the test.

So if I understand correctly, 160C seems to win out on most tests, yet 160S
wins on the colour rendition test with 160C placing third. I checked out the
Fuji website
(http://www.fujifilm.com/JSP/fuji/epartners/PREventDetailPage.jsp?DBID=NEWS_825271&CAT_ID=-1007)
and 160C is called a "High Contrast, Vivid Colour" film, whereas 160S is a
"Smooth Tone, Natural Colour" film.