Digital - General

 

Re: Qimage


"Hebee Jeebes" wrote in message
news:44d62a42$0$34496$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
> No it isn't a RAW converter but it should be able to load them for
> printing. If they want photographers to use it they need this. They just
> took the chicken way out and expect you to convert everything to bitmap
> first.
>

So if you're going to shoot raw and dump it directly to the printer, why not
shoot jpg to begin with??

Mark

 

Article References :

Re: Qimage
Re: Qimage
Qimage
 

See Also : Re: Photography is bunk

In article , rfischer@bolt.sonic.net
says...

> A PC that isn't an equivalent, in other words. One with a slower
> processor, probably no Firewire or gigbit ethernet or high-speed
> USB or digitial video output or digitial audio inputs and outputs,
> and probably without even any software.

Nonsense. It had 5.1 on-board sound, 5 x USB2.0 ports and the graphics
card takes care of the video stuff.

> Let's see a link for this PC that you claim is 1/3rd the price.

www.zones.co.za or www.sahara.co.za or www.rectron.co.za

Hope you know how to use a currency converter...

> >Wrong again.
>
> Your biases are obvious.

My only bias is towards extracting the most bang for my bucks. Apple
doesn't cut it when it comes to price / performance.

> > I think Macs are very sexy, but very impractical for most
> >modern day users.
>
> Unlike the PCs that run a user-hostile OS like WinXP.

What bollocks. What utter bollocks...

--
Look. See. Take pictures. Share.