Australian

Re: Canon 400 or 100-400mm lens

Wrong type of birds !!!


dylan wrote:
> "Glenn" wrote in message
> news:42998bee@news.velocitynet.com.au...
>
>>Does anyone know of any camera shop in Sydney Currently selling on stock
>>one of the Canon lenses 400 5.6 USM or the 100-400 mm Zoom.
>>
>>Hoping to pick one up asap but Canon Suppliers in my region do not have
>>any and Canon themselves currently appear to be short. Sort of slowly
>>transitioning from Nikon to Canon but the Nikon is now developing errors
>>so it has forced my hand quicker than I anticipated.
>>
>>Hopefully I wont have to spend all day at work (At taxpayers expense)
>>;-)
>>
>>ringing around
>>
>>Ideally I want the 400mm Prime but due to Murphys factor ( I have no time
>>to waste etc) I will force myself to buy the zoom.
>>
>>Glenn
>
>
> Before you decide to buy it may be worth reading
> this..http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/forgotten-400.shtml
> I bought the 400mmm 5.6L and although it can be a bit slow at times due to
> the f5.6 and won't AF on a 10D with the 1.4x extender at f8, I'm very
> pleased with it.
> some photos at http://www.knighttrain.freeserve.co.uk/birds.htm, note some
> were taken through glass so not always the lens's fault !
>
>

 

Article References :

Canon 400 or 100-400mm lens
Re: Canon 400 or 100-400mm lens
 

See Also : Re: Nikon D70 v Pentax *ist DS


wrote in message
news:1108080515.756680.79150@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
| bratislav3162@hotmail.com wrote:
|
| > Think ahead.
| > There's tons of really sharp glass for Nikon (especially second
| hand).
| > Not so great choice for Pentax. You will grow out the standard zoom
| > quickly, and then there's open road for Nikon (or Canon) but Pentax
| is
| > very limited.
|

Canon this, Nikon that... I'm very happy with my *ist DS that I purchased a
few weeks ago... though it took a few to get it right (see my earlier post
on here "3 pentaxes in 3 days"). I'm putting that down to bad luck, though
I'm sure doomsayers on here would howl that it must mean all pentax cameras
are faulty. My DS body I have now works perfectly, it's just the operator
that needs refining!

As for the availablitiy of "glass" that people love to go on about, well
they are assuming a lot. You never said what the cameras main use will be,
or how much you would be willing to spend... apparently we all have $$$ to
spend on the latest USM f0.8 IS doohickey. Me, I'd be stoked to pick up a
pentax A 50mm 1.7 prime from a garage sale or secondhand place and play with
that. Of course future lens selction may be a big thing for you and then I
stand corrected :)

My reasons for choosing the *ist DS were: price (with 2 lenses it seemed
pretty good to start with); I had no other SLR lenses except my old canon FD
stuff; and browsing many photo forums saw me find no reason _not_ to buy the
DS. Am I happy with my purchase? Absolutely. A good article on the DS can
found over at Luminous Landscape:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-jan-05.shtml

Here's some of the pics I've taken with my DS:
http://www.pbase.com/bookster/istds

Bookster